Multiple versions of harm reduction psychotherapy for alcohol and drug use have been described in detail but not yet studied empirically. However, to date there have been no published empirical trials testing the effectiveness of the approach. Specific intervention strategies include helping the person identify and cope with high-risk situations, eliminating myths regarding a drug’s effects, managing lapses, and addressing misperceptions about the relapse process.

Her over 15 years’ experience working in healthcare administration and management quickly launched her into a leadership role. Now serving as the Director of Human Resources since 2018, she leads our organization through the intricate requirements of recordkeeping, recruitment, staff development as well as compliance. While also directing all aspects of HR including payroll, benefits administration, performance management, and compliance with federal, state, and local employment laws, as well as licensing and accreditation standards. This isn’t the only way in which our thinking might become twisted when we experience a lapse in sobriety. Abstinence violation effect fuels our negative cognition, causing us to judge ourselves quite harshly. This is especially true if we are involved in a twelve-step program, as we now realize we must reset our chips.

Countering The Effects Of Abstinence Violation Effect

Additionally, other findings suggest the influence of a DRD4 variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism on response to olanzapine, a dopamine antagonist that has been studied as an experimental treatment for alcohol problems. Olanzapine was found to reduce alcohol-related craving those with the long-repeat VNTR (DRD4 L), but not individuals with the short-repeat version (DRD4 S; [100,101]). Further, a randomized trial of olanzapine led to significantly improved drinking outcomes in DRD4 L abstinence violation effect but not DRD4 S individuals [100]. Perceived predictors of relapse and importance rating as indicated by health practitioners and persons who regained weight. There is less research examining the extent to which moderation/controlled use goals are feasible for individuals with DUDs. The most recent national survey assessing rates of illicit drug use and SUDs found that among individuals who report illicit drug use in the past year, approximately 15% meet criteria for one or more DUD (SAMHSA, 2019a).

• The focus is on identifying and accepting the urge, not acting on the urge or attempting to fight it4.
• If we feel stress, anger or depression, we do not find healthy ways of confronting these feelings.

Given the rapid growth in this area, we allocate a portion of this review to discussing initial evidence for genetic associations with relapse. Specifically, we focus on recent, representative findings from studies evaluating candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as moderators of response to substance use interventions. It is important to note that these studies were not designed to evaluate specific components of the RP model, nor do these studies explicitly espouse the RP model. Also, many studies have focused solely on pharmacological interventions, and are therefore not directly related to the RP model. However, we review these findings in order to illustrate the scope of initial efforts to include genetic predictors in treatment studies that examine relapse as a clinical outcome.

Understand The Relapse Process

Getting through the holidays while maintaining recovery, especially for people newer to this life-changing process, is an accomplishment worthy of celebration in its own right. When an urge to use hits, it can be helpful to engage the brain’s reward pathway in an alternative direction by quickly substituting a thought or activity that’s more beneficial or fun— taking a walk, listening to a favorite piece of music. Possible substitutes can be designated in advance, made readily available, listed in a relapse prevention plan, and swiftly summoned when the need arises.

Since cravings do not last forever, engaging in conversation about the feelings as they occur with someone who understands their nature can help a person ride out the craving. Others take advantage of the many types of peer support groups that provide, in addition to useful information, the wisdom and coping strategies of others who have faced the same hurdles; it is the ethos of such groups that members support their peers through crises without judgment. At this stage, a person might not even think about using substances, but there is a lack of attention to self-care, the person is isolating from others, and they may be attending therapy sessions or group meetings only intermittently. Attention to sleep and healthy eating is minimal, as is attention to emotions and including fun in one’s life.

Specific Intervention strategies in Relapse Prevention

Findings indicated nonlinear relationships between SE and urges, such that momentary SE decreased linearly as urges increased but dropped abruptly as urges peaked. Moreover, this finding appeared attributable to individual differences in baseline (tonic) levels of SE. When urge and negative affect were low, individuals with low, intermediate or high baseline SE were similar in their momentary SE ratings. However, these groups’ momentary ratings diverged significantly at high levels of urges and negative affect, such that those with low baseline SE had large drops in momentary SE in the face of increasingly challenging situations. These findings support that higher distal risk can result in bifurcations (divergent patterns) of behavior as the level of proximal risk factors increase, consistent with predictions from nonlinear dynamic systems theory [31]. First, as we wanted to keep the generation of statements feasible and non-confusing for the participants, we formulated one focus statement in which the predictors of physical activity and dietary behavior were combined and no distinction between lapse and relapse was made.

The weight of this guilt often correlates to the amount of time spent in recovery leading up to the relapse. Those with only a few weeks of sobriety will not feel as bad as those with years under their belt. Not out of the same warped practicality mentioned above, but because they simply feel as if they are hopeless. Triggers include cravings, problematic thought patterns, and external cues or situations, all of which can contribute to increased self-efficacy (a sense of personal confidence, identity, and control) when properly managed.

Critiques of the RP Model

In this technique, the client is first taught to label internal sensations and cognitive preoccupations as an urge, and to foster an attitude of detachment from that urge. The focus is on identifying and accepting the urge, not acting on the urge or attempting to fight it4. Another factor that may occur is the Problem of Immediate Gratification where the client settles for shorter positive outcomes and does not consider larger long term adverse consequences when they lapse. This can be worked on by creating a decisional matrix where the pros and cons of continuing the behaviour versus abstaining are written down within both shorter and longer time frames and the therapist helps the client to identify unrealistic outcome expectancies5.